Caucus Fraud
If Obama is such a great candidate, why did he have to cheat to win?
P.S. If you don’t have time to read the whole website (which is humongous), here’s a handy a 98-page report that summarizes the key findings and includes a few eyewitness stories from each state. Suitable for printing out and taking with you to Denver…
5 Responses to “Caucus Fraud”
-
DeniseB says:
I am unable to open the 98-page report - the file seems to be corrupted.
August 22nd, 2008 at 11:40 pm EST -
Violet says:
Hm. Do you have an up-to-date version of Adobe Reader?
-
Lexia says:
Nope, same here. Message says file is damaged and could not be repaired.
Do the o-bots mad skillz extend to hacking PDFs?
-
Val says:
Well it worked for me - just lucky I guess ;-)
[but I just had the system worked on] -
quixote says:
How rigged the caucuses were comes as a shock even to me. I just spent an hour I didn’t have caught up in that report. It was obvious at the time that there was funny business going on. But this MUCH?
No way there could be such huge discrepancies, and the Party leadership missed it. As well as the candidates. Hillary wasn’t allowed to say anything because it was, obviously, all sour grapes. And everybody else was fine with it.
Un-effing-believable.
And here I’ve been, assuming all along that the Democrats are just stupid but not otherwise like the Republicans. They’re ALL stealing elections now. Some just steal them cheaper, faster, and better than others.
(pdf worked fine for me. System: ubuntu, Firefox3, and evince pdf reader…. Something ironic about open source software reading pdfs okay while Adobe itself chokes.)
