Skip to main content.
July 1st, 2008

Comment of the day (with additional remarks by Violet)

From marge twain:

I’ve felt for the past few months that our nation must be going through one of those mass-insanity, mob-rule periods like the Salem witch trials or the Prohibition era or the McCarthy pinko scare. I imagine that history will not look kindly on this time. Future schoolchildren will wonder what possessed us all and what side would they have been on in the witchhunt of 2008.

I could have written that myself. In fact, a few years from now if I come across that paragraph in some data dumpster dive, I’ll probably think I did write it. It’s exactly how I feel.

I’m feeling it especially today, with the news that Obama is planning to keep Bush’s faith-based programs. God almighty. How much clearer can it get? Coming on top of the FISA immunity thing, the campaign finance reversal, and the trial balloon about keeping Gates on as Secretary of Defense, it’s a miracle of nature that the possums can’t see what this guy is about. If he started showing up at press conferences wearing a flight suit, do you think they’d get it then? (Answering self: no; see insanity, mass.)

None of this is a surprise to us PUMAs, who have been sounding the alarm since before we were PUMAs. I stand by what I said here, which is pretty much what I’ve been saying for months: Obama represents the metastasization of the Republican cancer to the Democratic Party. That’s why we’re fighting him. How many Republican parties do we need in this country, anyway?

Posted by Violet in Election 2008, PUMA

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 1st, 2008 at 5:41 pm EST and is filed under Election 2008, PUMA. You can follow any responses to this entry through the comments RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

20 Responses to “Comment of the day (with additional remarks by Violet)”

  1. myiq2xu says:

    Well, whaddya expect?

    Since less than half the Democratic voters chose him, he’s running for the GOP nomination now.

    Does that make McCain the Democrat?

  2. Violet says:

    Speak of the devil — I was just over at Corrente and saw that VastLeft has unendorsed Opossum. Straw, camel’s back.

  3. ugsome says:

    Get a load of this comment from DemocraticUnderground:

    “‘Obama embraces Bush’s faith-based plan’ is a media-driven wedge designed to piss you off.”

    http://journals.democraticunderground.com/EarlG/108

    The mental gymnastics are amazing.

  4. Violet says:

    They’re cultists. They can rationalize anything. They remind me of those groups whose leader prophesizes the end of the world, and when the end of the world doesn’t come they figure out a way to explain that that wasn’t what he really meant/calculations were off/it’s a test of their faith/whatever.

  5. Anna Belle says:

    Exactly. This PUMA is fighting to protect the presence of choice. I can live in a world where the corrupt and privileged rule, but I will not tolerate a world in which they claim every scrap of ground and all the resources too. They can have their wealth and their hoarding ways, and their abuse of power, but we will fight them, even if Democrats no longer will.

    And that comment is perfect. I love your comment of the day posts.

  6. Anna Belle says:

    Oh, clever how they try to play it off as Bill’s fault too, ugsome. While he did do that, and I did disapprove at the time, the funds religious charities got from the Clinton administration had to be used for housing. Which is categorically different from giving funding for such nonsense as abstinence-only pregnancy prevention and gay “recovery” services, which is what the Bush Administration provided, in law. That kool-aide must be some potent stuff.

  7. Violet says:

    Read the comments at the LA Times (the link in the post) or I’m sure at any fauxgressive Obamabot blog. Because “Barack” is pushing faith-based crap, suddenly it’s a good thing. “I trust Barack” bleat the sheep.

    The Republicans couldn’t have come up with a better way to destroy the progressive movement from within if they’d invented him. Which maybe they did.

  8. Janis says:

    Do you know what this reminds me of?

    An overbearing asshole husband and his long-suffering wife who, when the husband verbally jacks off all over the place and leaves a bevy of offended people around at a cocktail party, wanders around behind him with a conversational pooper-scooper going, “He didn’t really mean thaaaaaaat … “

  9. Janis says:

    Regards metastasization:

    http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=6686#81950

    This isn’t about ideological metastasization, though. More like fiscal.

  10. egalia says:

    Yeah, they can rationalize anything alright. Keith O. told them it’s bad when Bush does it, but good when Obama does it. DU is a wonder to behold these days.

  11. Alikatze says:

    I was horrified to read this news in the NYT today. The article there made it sound like he was trying to scoop up some of the Christian Right that John McSame doesn’t know how to talk to. It seems to me that advisors got ahold of Obama and told him the campaign he was running in the primaries had to stop if he wanted to be POTUS. All the liberal talk had to go! Did you hear that Colin Powell is apparently about to fall in line behind Obama? I guess BO has made enough Republican-esque noises that now top GOP brass want the kool-aid, too! OMFG.

    I am beginning to think more and more that the majority of the American electorate is a bunch of morons. Are people really this dim???…

  12. falstaff says:

    I’m finding myself indulging in the audacity of hope… that the superdelegates — sheep though they have been — are remembering that they haven’t actually voted yet. Don’t even hang that on dismay over Obama’s shucking of principles (like, say, the Constitution). The sheer pragmatic/realpolitik ineptitude of this “campaign” is astonishing. ALL of its good thinking happened two years ago, when they figured out how to gin up a “movement” and game the caucuses. Since then, they’ve been running on fumes — and those are giving out fast.

    I know, I know… this is a fantasy — but even a big cat can dream, can’t he?

  13. Anna Belle says:

    I think you and I agree on a lot Violet, because I have been saying that same thing about this having the smell of Republican land mines all over it. That’s the metaphor I use when I talk about how they plant crap all over the place just hoping something suitable will explode somewhere down the road. They really are terrorists at governance.

    That said, I wrote about Obama and the Joshua Generation a couple of weeks ago, as I’m familiar with the crowd and had some insights. Some scary ones, sure, but insights nevertheless. Heh.

  14. kenoshaMarge says:

    The media chose Obama, the media anointed Obama and the Superdelegates and many of the sheeple climbed on board the good ship Obamacrat.I have no hope or faith in the Super-delegates.

    I don’t see how the Democratic Party can back down from it’s presumptive nominee now. They find themselves between a rock and a hard place with Republicans to the right of them and 1/2 their party to the left of them. A place they chose and where they must now reside.

    The country is at stake and we have two nominees that will do little or nothing for the average citizen, the dignity or integrity of our nation as a whole or our standing in the world community.

    Therefore we, as citizens of this fucked up government must now reside in Rock-Hardplace Town along with our muttonheaded leadership. A leadership that isn’t competent to lead a 4th of July Parade let alone a country.

    I think I’ll just move to Margaritaville.

  15. lorelynn says:

    I will remind you that Roger Stone ran and funded Al Sharpton’s campaign in 2004. I wondered what that was all about at the time and now I wonder if it was a trial run to see if they could run a Democratic campaign. Now, low and behold, we have a young, black male candidate running for the presidency who utterly trashed an experienced female candidate who was going to be very difficult for the GOP to beat in the general election. I cannot figure out who encouraged Obama to run with no real resume to his name. Rezko, to whom Obama is in debt, has far more ties to the GOP than the Dems do. And why on earth would Roger Stone be running Sharpton’s campaign? I understand why Sharpton did it. I don’t understand why Stone did.

  16. Kat says:

    Oh dear, I looked at the Democratic Underground link above, and those people scare the #$&#^ out of me. They’ve got it all: accusations of racism to shut down differing opinions; plenty of “my candidate right or wrong” threads — good thing they’re not a cult (though they’re only called cult-like by racists, apparently); and most creepy of all, fawning hero worship threads saying how brilliant and subtle a chess player BO is, and how every weasel dance sell-out is really A Grand Plan.

    And, all this occurring around a discussion of the BO campaign’s mendacious and disturbing chest-puffing about Iran, Iraq and Pakistan in the FT — which is, to be fair, attracting some sane DU posters:

    link

    Nice.

  17. GRL says:

    Well, people in Missouri are starting to wake up, perhaps…Things are happening that don’t bode well for Obama’s electoral map…

    “Missouri and McCain”
    http://preview.tinyurl.com/4vqz7c

    I also add more discussion about polling, on the heels of my previous post about my experiences as a Gallup survey director and the bias in polls. Of course, it’s gotten MUCH WORSE since my time…Gallup is a scary place now…

  18. marge twain says:

    Thanks for the shout out, Violet!

    To those who think the nomination is in any way uncertain until the convention: I read somewhere that Howard Dean has vowed to make sure Clinton will not be on the ballot at the convention, which would have been customary. It seems like another unnecessary humiliation. Seems they’re afraid she can’t be stopped until she’s dead and buried.

  19. Annie Oakley says:

    I’ve noticed for awhile now that Republicans work in two-fers, minimum. If you’re going to put effort into an operation, make sure the payoff is worth the investment. This one may be a three-fer: 1) get a pliant president, 2) destroy the Left, and 3) completely distract from the carnage left from the Bush administration.

    To quote Roseanne (why not?), We are so far beyond screwed it will take years for the light from screwed to reach us.

  20. Janis says:

    We are so far beyond screwed it will take years for the light from screwed to reach us.

    I shouldn’t be laughing right now, but I am. Perhaps it’s the tequila.

Leave a Reply

Enter the code that you see in the image