The John A. Davison School of Blogging
Thanks to John A. Davison, I’ve figured out how to deal with my spam problem. Every time I want to write another post, I’ll just start a new blog.
8 Responses to “The John A. Davison School of Blogging”
-
Paul Tergeist says:
Let me get this straight. John’s position is that evolution can’t exist? Time passes but nothing happens?
May 18th, 2006 at 10:12 pm EST -
Violet says:
Who the hell knows? He’s supposed to be a creationist, but as far as I can tell he’s just obsessed with someone named DaveScott.
-
Mandos says:
Actually changing blogs is a common solution to the spam problem…
-
Violet says:
Did you read the piece at Pharyngula? Poor Mr. Davison doesn’t realize he can have more than one post in his blog. In his first blog, he had one post, and then just commented on it for months. Over 800 comments. When that got unwieldy, instead of putting up a new post, he started a whole new blog.
And all he does in his comments is rail against what DaveScott said, but because he deletes all of DaveScott’s comments it’s impossible to know what the fuck he’s talking about. I swear to god, it’s like absurdist theatre.
-
Paul Tergeist says:
From 4: “Did you read the piece at Pharyngula?”
I have now. Mr. Davison is my hero. I am going to emulate him. Comments that I already do are not solicited.
-
Txfeminist says:
Violet, you have such a way of finding the funniest damn stuff. Oh, my, god. that is hysterical!!!
-
gordo says:
I don’t know how to feel about that guy. On the one hand, he’s arrogant and unpleasant, so the blogs are comical.
On the other hand, he’s crazy and this seems to make him unhappy. So the blogs are kind of sad as well.
-
Brother Joseph Temperance says:
I wonder if anyone has thought of inviting that distinguished thinker to Landover? The site seems to be down at present (why else would any godfearing True Christian male be at any other site, especially one as blatantly satanocommunistic as this one?) but I am sure that with the help of JESUS we will soon be up and running again, and I can’t help thinking that we would provide an excellent forum for Mr. Davidson’s esteemed thoughts.
